![]() ![]() I will keep the X100F as it's a great camera to always have with me, but those RAW files! Come on Fuji/Adobe, get your heads together on this one. To say I'm disappointed is an understatement, but at least I found out before investing any further. ![]() I've tried 'Iridient X Transformer' (Yes, there is a dedicated RAW converter just for Fuji files as it's a known issue!), no better. ![]() I've tried the 'Enhance Detail' option in Lightroom, which is slightly better. I'm led to believe that 'Capture One' makes a better job of rendering the RAF files than Lightroom, but I'm invested in Lightroom and Photoshop so don't want to change, and shouldn't have to. Now some will say this is pixel peeping, and they won't show in print, but they are there, and I want to start processing with the cleanest image possible. The RAW files from my old D5100 are much cleaner. The artefacts are almost impossible to get rid of. The RAW files are awful, at least in Lightroom. What could possibly go wrong? WORMS, that's what could go wrong. It has the same sensor as the XT-3 so would be a good test of what it could do. I took the X100F on a landscape/woodland shoot to see what I could do with the RAW files. So good I had all but made up my mind to source a used XT-3 for my landscape images, as the X100F is limited with it's fixed focal length. For street work and travel it's unbeatable. Otherwise the cost of switching to capture one and investing time to learn that software is. Yes, the Fuji is a lovely camera to shoot with, and produces wonderful Jpegs. However, its trivial to install iridient x-transformer. Ok, my initial exuberance with my new camera is slowly waning. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |